The Latest


Photographer Lassi Rautiainen recently captured the profound partnership between a she-wolf and a brown bear in the wilds of northern Finland. For days, he witnessed the strange pair meet every evening to share food after a hard day of hunting. No one knows when or how this relationship was formed, “but it is certain that by now each of them needs the other.” - Source
Aug 29, 2014 / 9,591 notes

Photographer Lassi Rautiainen recently captured the profound partnership between a she-wolf and a brown bear in the wilds of northern Finland. For days, he witnessed the strange pair meet every evening to share food after a hard day of hunting. No one knows when or how this relationship was formed, “but it is certain that by now each of them needs the other.” - Source

(via obliteratedheart)

Aug 29, 2014 / 44,337 notes
higemania:

yuri_ebihara on Instagram
Aug 29, 2014 / 16 notes
animadetv:

The perpetual babbit machine - play the web game here
Aug 29, 2014 / 4,476 notes

animadetv:

The perpetual babbit machine - play the web game here

(via smoot)

Aug 29, 2014 / 289 notes
newyorker:

Margaret  Talbot on the cover of a fiftieth-anniversary edition of Roald Dahl’s “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory”:

“Dahl’s young characters always have agency; their magic powers or ingenious schemes—what their adult overlords consider misbehavior—always save the day. The Modern Classics cover has not a whiff of this validation of childish imagination; instead, it seems to imply a deviant adult audience.”
Aug 29, 2014 / 194 notes

newyorker:

Margaret  Talbot on the cover of a fiftieth-anniversary edition of Roald Dahl’s “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory”:

“Dahl’s young characters always have agency; their magic powers or ingenious schemes—what their adult overlords consider misbehavior—always save the day. The Modern Classics cover has not a whiff of this validation of childish imagination; instead, it seems to imply a deviant adult audience.”

http://www.designboom.com/art/zuk-club-paint-lugano-skatepark-grafitti-sundial-08-08-2014/
zuk club paints lugano skatepark as a working sundial
Aug 12, 2014 / 1 note
http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/05/future-of-ife/

Why your brand-new plane doesn’t have a seat-back TV
BY ZACH HONIG  @ZACHHONIG  4 DAYS AGO
Earlier this year, I boarded a United flight from Newark to San Diego. After passing the first few rows, a young boy turned to his mother and asked, “Why aren’t there any TVs?”
"It’s probably an older plane," she responded — but that couldn’t be further from the truth.
The aircraft, a 737-900 with Boeing’s Sky Interior (a Dreamliner-esque recessed ceiling lit with blue LEDs), had only been flying for a few weeks. It looked new, and it even had that “new plane smell” most passengers would only associate with a factory-fresh auto. But despite the plane’s clean and bright appearance, the family only noticed the glaring absence of seat-back screens. To them, our 737 might as well have rolled off the assembly line in 1984.
Dozens of other passengers made similar remarks as they walked by my seat, and many more probably inquired with a flight attendant or aired their complaints on Facebook or Twitter. I had a similar experience while flying the same route last week. I was seated next to a corporate executive who normally travels on United’s better-equipped international fleet — he was clearly unhappy about the entertainment situation, and, like the mother I heard earlier in the year, assumed that our brand-spankin’-new 737 predated the 21st century. It’s reasonable to assume a new plane would be delivered with the latest technology, but unfortunately that isn’t the case.
THAT NEW PLANE SMELL

The Newark-to-San Diego flight, scheduled for more than six hours from gate to gate, is a prime candidate for airline-provided entertainment. If you don’t come prepared, those raggedy catalogs and magazines in the seat-back pocket can occupy an hour or two at best. Unfortunately, airlines don’t make it easy to figure out whether you’ll have on-demand content, live video or absolutely nothing at all on board. Our flight was equipped withExede, the fastest WiFi in the sky, provided by the speedy ViaSat-1 satellite and installed byLiveTV, the same company responsible for outfitting United’s 737 fleet with seat-back DirecTV. But leisure travelers seem to be most interested in video, as low quality as it may be.Instead of the DirecTV logo that occasionally appears in the entertainment section of United’s flight status page, the flight only listed onboard WiFi, along with a promise from the airline: “Personal device entertainment is coming soon,” which will enable you to view content streaming from the plane using your own laptop, smartphone or tablet. Boeing delivers all of United’s 737s without entertainment or WiFi — instead, a third party handles the installation. But since airlines want to get their new planes into service immediately, they usually schedule installations, which take an aircraft out of commission for several days, for a few weeks or months down the line. That means hundreds of bored passengers every day, and a negative perception of the plane and the airline.Streaming video, like the version United’s planning to launch, is very attractive to airlines. Seat-back displays cost carriers thousands of dollars a pop, and outfitting an entire aircraft is very expensive, even before you factor in maintenance and costs to upgrade once a better solution becomes available. Displays at each seat also add significant weight, which causes each plane to burn pricey fuel more quickly. So, instead of installing TVs, many carriers are opting to let passengers use the tablets and laptops they already have to access content on a server in the aircraft’s belly.
BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE

It’s a means to the same end. You get to be entertained, and the airline can collect that coveted ancillary revenue. Even though it’s rarely in HD, the content you watch on your tablet or laptop will often look much better than what you’d get with an aging seat-back screen, and passengers on red-eye flights won’t have to deal with the light from unused displays filling the cabin and keeping them awake. You will be on the hook for power (many planes now have outlets installed at every seat), and your device will likely get in the way during the meal service, if there is one, but the trade-offs are worthwhile, for airlines and passengers alike.Gogo, the most prolific in-flight internet provider, also leads the market when it comes to streaming-entertainment service. More than 1,500 American, Delta, US Airways and Scoot (an Asian low-cost carrier) planes have Gogo Vision installed, and Aeromexico, Alaska and JAL are scheduled to carry it, too. Most of the planes with Gogo’s WiFi have Vision available as well — the company can use the existing WiFi infrastructure, adding only a content loader in the cabin for maintenance to refresh movies and television shows using a USB flash drive. Alaska Airlines is planning to install a unique version of the system that excludes internet access, so passengers can still stream content on routes without coverage.
A USB flash duplicator copies streaming content onto loader drives at Gogo’s Chicago headquarters.
Global Eagle, the company behind the Row 44 satellite internet installed on Southwest’s fleet, takes streaming content one step further with live TV. If your plane is connected to the web, you’ll also have access to streaming television content. Dish provides that service on Southwest’s 737s, where you can choose from 19 live channels and up to 75 recorded TV episodes on each flight. You can also purchase movies for $5 each, with more than 25 titles available on each plane. Like Gogo, Global Eagle can stream content to customers on planes that aren’t connected to the web. That product, called WISE, is already installed on some of Philippine Airlines’ planes, and it’s scheduled to launch with a second Asian carrier soon.LiveTV is another major in-flight WiFi player in the US. That company was formerly a JetBlue subsidiary, but was recently acquired by Thales Group, a French aerospace conglomerate. Unfortunately, LiveTV executives, who now report to Thales, were unable to detail their future offerings, but we do know the company has been hard at work installing speedy Ka-band satellite WiFi on JetBlue’s A320s and United’s 737s.
The airlines play a big part in how you use this technology, too. While Global Eagle, Gogo and LiveTV install the systems used to provide content, each carrier sets pricing. Most movies and TV shows available through Delta Studio, a Gogo service, are free for international, First Class and Economy Comfort passengers, for example, though other airlines can charge anywhere from $1 to $7 per program, depending on pricing models and studio arrangements. If you’re able to stream content from a third-party site, such as Hulu, you’ll likely pay an upcharge for faster in-flight service, so even if you don’t purchase programming from the airline, it’ll still collect a fee.
STREAMING FROM THE WEB

JetBlue’s trying something different with its Fly-Fi in-flight internet. Instead of blocking access to bandwidth-heavy streaming sites, the airline’s allowing you to view content (even in HD) from a variety of websites, assuming you’re willing to pay a relatively high fee. ViaSat provides the satellite service, which is capable of supporting many passengers streaming video simultaneously. Even if you watch several movies over the course of a flight, however, it probably isn’t worthwhile to pay the $9-per-hour fee (that adds up to $45 for a single five-hour flight) — you’ll end up spending less if you download rentals while you’re still on the ground.As for Gogo, Chief Commercial Officer Ash ElDifrawi expects future generations of its service to enable streaming content from outside the plane, be that live television or media already available over the internet, through sites like Hulu and Netflix. Gogo’s current air-to-ground service isn’t fast enough for HD streaming, but the company’s next-generation GTO(ground-to-air) product should support it. That satellite system could also enable the company to offer live TV, like the Global Eagle service you’ll find on Southwest’s planes, but Gogo’s next-generation infrastructure is still a few years out.
"At some point, we see an opportunity for products like IPTV, music and other media content," ElDifrawi said. "We also see an opportunity for streaming through connectivity as more bandwidth becomes available."



Of course, a TV-less future impacts the flight crew, especially just before takeoff — without seat-back or overhead displays, crews will need to do a live safety demo before each flight. That means reading a script over the PA as flight attendants throughout the cabin show you how to fasten your seatbelt, use an oxygen mask and put on a life vest. It’s a time-consuming task and removes flight attendants from other duties, such as checking the cabin thoroughly before takeoff.While inconvenient for the crew, the pros still outweigh the cons for airlines that barely break even on any given flight. Revenue from streaming services could impact a route’s profitability, while a screen-free cabin helps the carrier trim some fat, resulting in a lighter aircraft that burns less fuel. As with in-flight WiFi, it may take a while for streaming services to become a compelling option for all passengers, but the next time you board a plane that doesn’t have TVs, know that the future looks very bright.
[Photo credit: Boeing (empty cabin and flight attendant)]
Aug 10, 2014

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/05/future-of-ife/

Why your brand-new plane doesn’t have a seat-back TV

BY ZACH HONIG  @ZACHHONIG  4 DAYS AGO

Earlier this year, I boarded a United flight from Newark to San Diego. After passing the first few rows, a young boy turned to his mother and asked, “Why aren’t there any TVs?”

"It’s probably an older plane," she responded — but that couldn’t be further from the truth.

The aircraft, a 737-900 with Boeing’s Sky Interior (a Dreamliner-esque recessed ceiling lit with blue LEDs), had only been flying for a few weeks. It looked new, and it even had that “new plane smell” most passengers would only associate with a factory-fresh auto. But despite the plane’s clean and bright appearance, the family only noticed the glaring absence of seat-back screens. To them, our 737 might as well have rolled off the assembly line in 1984.

Dozens of other passengers made similar remarks as they walked by my seat, and many more probably inquired with a flight attendant or aired their complaints on Facebook or Twitter. I had a similar experience while flying the same route last week. I was seated next to a corporate executive who normally travels on United’s better-equipped international fleet — he was clearly unhappy about the entertainment situation, and, like the mother I heard earlier in the year, assumed that our brand-spankin’-new 737 predated the 21st century. It’s reasonable to assume a new plane would be delivered with the latest technology, but unfortunately that isn’t the case.

THAT NEW PLANE SMELL

The Newark-to-San Diego flight, scheduled for more than six hours from gate to gate, is a prime candidate for airline-provided entertainment. If you don’t come prepared, those raggedy catalogs and magazines in the seat-back pocket can occupy an hour or two at best. Unfortunately, airlines don’t make it easy to figure out whether you’ll have on-demand content, live video or absolutely nothing at all on board. Our flight was equipped withExede, the fastest WiFi in the sky, provided by the speedy ViaSat-1 satellite and installed byLiveTV, the same company responsible for outfitting United’s 737 fleet with seat-back DirecTV. But leisure travelers seem to be most interested in video, as low quality as it may be.

Instead of the DirecTV logo that occasionally appears in the entertainment section of United’s flight status page, the flight only listed onboard WiFi, along with a promise from the airline: “Personal device entertainment is coming soon,” which will enable you to view content streaming from the plane using your own laptop, smartphone or tablet. Boeing delivers all of United’s 737s without entertainment or WiFi — instead, a third party handles the installation. But since airlines want to get their new planes into service immediately, they usually schedule installations, which take an aircraft out of commission for several days, for a few weeks or months down the line. That means hundreds of bored passengers every day, and a negative perception of the plane and the airline.

Streaming video, like the version United’s planning to launch, is very attractive to airlines. Seat-back displays cost carriers thousands of dollars a pop, and outfitting an entire aircraft is very expensive, even before you factor in maintenance and costs to upgrade once a better solution becomes available. Displays at each seat also add significant weight, which causes each plane to burn pricey fuel more quickly. So, instead of installing TVs, many carriers are opting to let passengers use the tablets and laptops they already have to access content on a server in the aircraft’s belly.

BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE

It’s a means to the same end. You get to be entertained, and the airline can collect that coveted ancillary revenue. Even though it’s rarely in HD, the content you watch on your tablet or laptop will often look much better than what you’d get with an aging seat-back screen, and passengers on red-eye flights won’t have to deal with the light from unused displays filling the cabin and keeping them awake. You will be on the hook for power (many planes now have outlets installed at every seat), and your device will likely get in the way during the meal service, if there is one, but the trade-offs are worthwhile, for airlines and passengers alike.

Gogo, the most prolific in-flight internet provider, also leads the market when it comes to streaming-entertainment service. More than 1,500 American, Delta, US Airways and Scoot (an Asian low-cost carrier) planes have Gogo Vision installed, and Aeromexico, Alaska and JAL are scheduled to carry it, too. Most of the planes with Gogo’s WiFi have Vision available as well — the company can use the existing WiFi infrastructure, adding only a content loader in the cabin for maintenance to refresh movies and television shows using a USB flash drive. Alaska Airlines is planning to install a unique version of the system that excludes internet access, so passengers can still stream content on routes without coverage.

A USB flash duplicator copies streaming content onto loader drives at Gogo's Chicago headquarters.
A USB flash duplicator copies streaming content onto loader drives at Gogo’s Chicago headquarters.

Global Eagle, the company behind the Row 44 satellite internet installed on Southwest’s fleet, takes streaming content one step further with live TV. If your plane is connected to the web, you’ll also have access to streaming television content. Dish provides that service on Southwest’s 737s, where you can choose from 19 live channels and up to 75 recorded TV episodes on each flight. You can also purchase movies for $5 each, with more than 25 titles available on each plane. Like Gogo, Global Eagle can stream content to customers on planes that aren’t connected to the web. That product, called WISE, is already installed on some of Philippine Airlines’ planes, and it’s scheduled to launch with a second Asian carrier soon.

LiveTV is another major in-flight WiFi player in the US. That company was formerly a JetBlue subsidiary, but was recently acquired by Thales Group, a French aerospace conglomerate. Unfortunately, LiveTV executives, who now report to Thales, were unable to detail their future offerings, but we do know the company has been hard at work installing speedy Ka-band satellite WiFi on JetBlue’s A320s and United’s 737s.

The airlines play a big part in how you use this technology, too. While Global Eagle, Gogo and LiveTV install the systems used to provide content, each carrier sets pricing. Most movies and TV shows available through Delta Studio, a Gogo service, are free for international, First Class and Economy Comfort passengers, for example, though other airlines can charge anywhere from $1 to $7 per program, depending on pricing models and studio arrangements. If you’re able to stream content from a third-party site, such as Hulu, you’ll likely pay an upcharge for faster in-flight service, so even if you don’t purchase programming from the airline, it’ll still collect a fee.

STREAMING FROM THE WEB

JetBlue’s trying something different with its Fly-Fi in-flight internet. Instead of blocking access to bandwidth-heavy streaming sites, the airline’s allowing you to view content (even in HD) from a variety of websites, assuming you’re willing to pay a relatively high fee. ViaSat provides the satellite service, which is capable of supporting many passengers streaming video simultaneously. Even if you watch several movies over the course of a flight, however, it probably isn’t worthwhile to pay the $9-per-hour fee (that adds up to $45 for a single five-hour flight) — you’ll end up spending less if you download rentals while you’re still on the ground.

As for Gogo, Chief Commercial Officer Ash ElDifrawi expects future generations of its service to enable streaming content from outside the plane, be that live television or media already available over the internet, through sites like Hulu and Netflix. Gogo’s current air-to-ground service isn’t fast enough for HD streaming, but the company’s next-generation GTO(ground-to-air) product should support it. That satellite system could also enable the company to offer live TV, like the Global Eagle service you’ll find on Southwest’s planes, but Gogo’s next-generation infrastructure is still a few years out.

"At some point, we see an opportunity for products like IPTV, music and other media content," ElDifrawi said. "We also see an opportunity for streaming through connectivity as more bandwidth becomes available."

Of course, a TV-less future impacts the flight crew, especially just before takeoff — without seat-back or overhead displays, crews will need to do a live safety demo before each flight. That means reading a script over the PA as flight attendants throughout the cabin show you how to fasten your seatbelt, use an oxygen mask and put on a life vest. It’s a time-consuming task and removes flight attendants from other duties, such as checking the cabin thoroughly before takeoff.

While inconvenient for the crew, the pros still outweigh the cons for airlines that barely break even on any given flight. Revenue from streaming services could impact a route’s profitability, while a screen-free cabin helps the carrier trim some fat, resulting in a lighter aircraft that burns less fuel. As with in-flight WiFi, it may take a while for streaming services to become a compelling option for all passengers, but the next time you board a plane that doesn’t have TVs, know that the future looks very bright.

[Photo credit: Boeing (empty cabin and flight attendant)]

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/07/ibm-synapse-supercomputing-chip-mimics-human-brain/

IBM’s new supercomputing chip mimics the human brain with very little power
BY JOSEPH VOLPE  @JRVOLPE  2 DAYS AGO

A lot has changed in the three years since IBM first unveiled a prototype of its human brain-inspired SyNAPSE (Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics) chip. That single-core prototype has now been significantly scaled up, leading to a new, production-ready SyNAPSE chip that blows past its predecessor with 1 million neurons, 256 million synapses and 4,096 neurosynaptic cores, all the while only requiring 70mW of power. Though the numbers are impressive, it’s what they translate to that holds even greater prominence: the ability for devices to process various sensory data in parallel just like the human brain, by merging memory and computing.



Traditionally, faster processing has always meant greater power consumption, but IBM’s new SyNAPSE chip flips that paradigm on its head. To give you some perspective of just how low-powered this supercomputing chip is, IBM’s Chief Scientist Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha says it requires power equivalent to that of a battery from a hearing aid. It’s an achievement that’s merited IBM the cover of the journal Science; it also has the potential to drastically alter conventional approaches to computing. In fact, the new SyNAPSE chip is so disruptive to the current computing landscape that IBM’s created a new programming language to go along with it and an educational outreach program called SyNAPSE University. It’s no wonder why the project received $53 million in funding from DARPA.

IBM’s Chief Scientist Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha says [the new SyNAPSE chip] requires power equivalent to that of a battery from a hearing aid.

IBM hasn’t publicly announced any partnerships to leverage its new SyNAPSE chip yet, though discussions are surely taking place. Currently, the company’s been able to build a programmable, working board with 16 of these chips working in concert — that represents 16 million neurons capable of processing instructions that, Modha says, would traditionally be carried out by “racks and racks of conventional computers.” Again, this is all done at an extremely low-powered state, which means the chips produce way less heat. It’s not hard to imagine some of the immediate benefits this could bring to consumers: for instance, laptops that don’t burn your lap; or even mobile phones that run for days and can process extreme amounts of environmental data.
But Modha sums up the magnitude of IBM’s new SyNAPSE chip best with this simple analogy: “You can carry our board in your backpack. You can’t carry four racks of conventional computers in your backpack.”

[Image credit: IBM]
Aug 10, 2014

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/07/ibm-synapse-supercomputing-chip-mimics-human-brain/

IBM’s new supercomputing chip mimics the human brain with very little power

A lot has changed in the three years since IBM first unveiled a prototype of its human brain-inspired SyNAPSE (Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics) chip. That single-core prototype has now been significantly scaled up, leading to a new, production-ready SyNAPSE chip that blows past its predecessor with 1 million neurons, 256 million synapses and 4,096 neurosynaptic cores, all the while only requiring 70mW of power. Though the numbers are impressive, it’s what they translate to that holds even greater prominence: the ability for devices to process various sensory data in parallel just like the human brain, by merging memory and computing.

Traditionally, faster processing has always meant greater power consumption, but IBM’s new SyNAPSE chip flips that paradigm on its head. To give you some perspective of just how low-powered this supercomputing chip is, IBM’s Chief Scientist Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha says it requires power equivalent to that of a battery from a hearing aid. It’s an achievement that’s merited IBM the cover of the journal Science; it also has the potential to drastically alter conventional approaches to computing. In fact, the new SyNAPSE chip is so disruptive to the current computing landscape that IBM’s created a new programming language to go along with it and an educational outreach program called SyNAPSE University. It’s no wonder why the project received $53 million in funding from DARPA.

IBM’s Chief Scientist Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha says [the new SyNAPSE chip] requires power equivalent to that of a battery from a hearing aid.

IBM hasn’t publicly announced any partnerships to leverage its new SyNAPSE chip yet, though discussions are surely taking place. Currently, the company’s been able to build a programmable, working board with 16 of these chips working in concert — that represents 16 million neurons capable of processing instructions that, Modha says, would traditionally be carried out by “racks and racks of conventional computers.” Again, this is all done at an extremely low-powered state, which means the chips produce way less heat. It’s not hard to imagine some of the immediate benefits this could bring to consumers: for instance, laptops that don’t burn your lap; or even mobile phones that run for days and can process extreme amounts of environmental data.

But Modha sums up the magnitude of IBM’s new SyNAPSE chip best with this simple analogy: “You can carry our board in your backpack. You can’t carry four racks of conventional computers in your backpack.”

[Image credit: IBM]

salapao:

まなちゃんかわゆい〜(>_<)♡
Aug 10, 2014 / 83 notes

salapao:

まなちゃんかわゆい〜(>_<)♡